Resilient AI Infrastructure · Private Beta

Stop losing 10% of your GPUs to training failures.

When AI workloads fail, we recover them automatically — or pinpoint the exact root cause.

Record the run, rewind on failure, replay the failing windowRECORDfailureREWINDREPLAY✓ pass → recover✗ fail → diagnose
✓ Not reproduced → transient

A bit flip, a network timeout, a race. Merge the verified state and continue from the failing step. No checkpoint rollback.

✗ Reproduced → persistent

A logic bug, memory corruption, bad data. Attribute it to software, data, or hardware. Emit the causal chain and a fix.

~8 hrs

between failures on a 1,000-GPU cluster

419

unexpected interruptions in 54 days of Llama 3 training

$44M

lost per year to 10% waste on 10,000 GPUs

Sources: Meta, The Llama 3 Herd of Models (2024), §3.3.4. Estimate: 10,000 GPUs × 8,760 h/year × 10% × $5/GPU-h = $43.8M.

Team alumni of
UMass Amherst
ByteDance
XPeng
DeepMind
Google
TigerGraph
Clustrix
PKWare
IBM
Inceptio
Intel

The Problem

The memory wall makes training failures more costly

Growing demand adds system complexity, making training more error-prone and harder to diagnose.

GROWING DEMAND
Larger models · longer contexts
MEMORY WALL
Hits capacity limit faster
SYSTEM COMPLEXITY
More memory policies · more failure points

10% waste ≈ $44M for 10,000 GPUs per year

Meta: 419 unexpected interruptions in 54 days of Llama 3 training.

Source: Meta, The Llama 3 Herd of Models (2024), §3.3.4. Estimate: 10,000 GPUs × 8,760 h/year × 10% × $5/GPU-h = $43.8M.

Two ways a run fails

Training stops

Crash · Hang · Out-of-memory

Training goes wrong silently

Silent corruption · Loss spike · Misconfiguration

Checkpoint-restart is blind

The only answer today is full rollback and restart. It cannot tell a GPU bit flip from a logic bug, it torches up to a checkpoint interval of compute every time, and it never says why.

Our Platform

Three line items on one savings report

Before the run, during the run, every run. The same recording layer pays for itself three ways.

before the run
e.g., $300K saved
for a day-3 config failure on 10K GPUs

Preflight check catches doomed configs in minutes

OOM-bound setups · wrong parallelism · precision & topology mismatches

XScope
during the run
$40M saved
for 10K GPUs each year (projected)

Fast recovery · auto-diagnosis

GPU waste from loud and silent failures cut from ~10% to 1–2% (projected)

Watcher
every run
Fewer GPUs, better performance

GPU + CPU memory diagnostics

Better memory policy · right-sized parallelism · less memory consumption

XScope

All three land on one savings report. Preflight, recovery, and memory diagnostics, from the same recording layer.

How it works

Zero-friction deployment

Deploy across your entire infrastructure without touching a single line of code.

1

API interception

Intercepts system calls, synchronizations, PyTorch, and CUDA APIs. No recompilation, no custom hypervisor, no deployment changes.

2

Always-on recording

Always-on selective recording at under 5% overhead in production. One recording feeds both recovery and diagnosis.

3

Replay: recover or diagnose

On failure, deterministic replay classifies it. Transient faults recover automatically; persistent bugs produce a full causal chain.

Why Teyon

Each one alone is a moat. Together they are a fortress.

Zero public training data, foundational IP, and a decade of compounding research advantage at the most selective systems conferences in the world.

3

Three-year competitor lag

A competitor starting today arrives after our ecosystem is locked.

3 yrs
to replicate
2

Patent-protected IP

Foundational IP on deterministic replay and automated root-cause analysis.

12 + 24
US patents granted + provisional · 14 owned by Teyon
1

Deep tech foundation

Zero public training data. LLMs cannot auto-generate the engine, even with massive effort.

10+ yrs
SOSP / PLDI breakthroughs

foundation ↑ compounding

SOSPPLDIOOPSLAICSECCSUSENIX Security

Ready for resilient AI infrastructure?

Stop losing $10K+ per GPU failure. Let's talk.